One contribution per quarter.
Review our work, or publish your own.
Every partner makes one contribution a quarter, in their partner home. The first choice is reviewing our work: check 10 signal cards a month, or review one playbook. Or publish your own piece in our journals, under your name. We fact-check our own work; you get our fact-checking tools, and you are responsible for the accuracy of your own work. Nothing extractive. No grind. One real thing per quarter. Here's what a published piece can look like.
The Algorithmic Tax
An evidence-based deep-dive on how social media platforms extract wealth from the communities that built them. Peer-reviewed citations. Receipts pulled from FTC settlements, Northeastern University ad-delivery research, and the DOJ's 2022 Meta agreement.
This is what a Track 1 contribution looks like at full size. You write it, and it is published in our journals under your name, on your responsibility for its accuracy.
The Suppression Files (Vol. 1 + 2)
A two-part forensic on how women's health content gets suppressed on social platforms — Facebook organic reach collapsing from 16% to 2.6%, the Northeastern algorithm-bias study, internal Meta findings, the math on what gets through and what doesn't.
Track 1 supports investigative formats too — multi-part series with running citations and screenshot evidence.
The Founder Dictation
A fifteen-minute voice memo capturing the founding vision — "the Bloomberg of women's health," "owned, built, run by women of color," "two sites, two halves of one architecture." Recorded in the car. Transcribed, structured, and synthesized by our editorial team into a published piece.
A piece can start as a recording. It is published under your name, and you are responsible for its accuracy.
Frontline case observations
An OBGYN dictates a five-minute observation about a contraception-counseling pattern that's emerged in her practice since the Title X freeze. Names anonymized. Pattern noted. Signal captured for the Queryable Clinical LLM and synthesized into a Labora Rounds intelligence brief.
You wouldn't have time to write the article. You did have time to talk while changing scrubs.
What you get in return.
What you don't have to build, source, or pay for.
Partners get access to our resources, and can publish their own work in our journals under their own name. Here's what comes with the partnership:
Our fact-checking tools
The tools we use to fact-check our own work. You use them on yours. We edit for clarity and accuracy; you are responsible for the accuracy of your own work.
Distribution across channels
Cross-promotion across Labora Collective + Diosa Ara channels — LinkedIn, the Labora newsletter network, the Yemaya site, podcast cross-talk. One piece reaches multiple audiences without you running ten accounts. Your partner page on this site, in a design you choose from those we offer, shows what we publish of yours, and you're listed in our public partner directory. You review the page before it goes live.
Research support
The data from our research database that your contribution needs, for use in that contribution — verified, and the opposite of Googling and getting algorithmic noise. Full use of the database for your own work is the Research Access Beta: we're opening it to our first 10 partners, by application, under a separate research access agreement.
Salons + convening
Quarterly salons. Cross-disciplinary conversations between clinicians, journalists, and operators in women's health. The room you'd otherwise have to build yourself. Guaranteed invitations. Between salons, the partners' group chats in the Labora Collective community.
Diosa Insiders membership
A complimentary Diosa Insiders membership in Labora Collective, with full access to the Intelligence Vault — every Labora Collective intelligence report, clinical briefing, and toolkit. Free as long as you're keeping up the quarterly contribution.
Institutional seats
If you run a practice or collective, we set up seats for your team in a conversation with you.
What a year as an Invited Partner actually looks like.
A representative twelve months. Real tempo, real outputs.
A note on what's shown above: The case studies in the first section reference work already published by Dr. Yamicia Connor on Labora Collective and Diosa Ara — used here as format examples of what Track 1 and Track 2 contributions look like at full size. Partner contributions from the inaugural cohort will replace these examples as they publish.